ASCO 2021: Efficacy of Avelumab + Axitinib (A + Ax) Versus Sunitinib (S) by IMDC Risk Group in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC): Extended Follow-up Results from JAVELIN Renal 101

(UroToday.com) There have been transformational changes in first-line therapy for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the past three years. Foremost among these is the move from monotherapy to combination approaches. While CheckMate 214 first brought combination therapy with dual checkpoint inhibition to the forefront, subsequent studies have examined combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in the first-line setting. One such study was the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006), which demonstrated improvements in progression-free survival and increased objective response rates for patients treated with avelumab and axitinib compared to sunitinib. In the Kidney and Bladder Poster session at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, Dr. John Haanen presented updated results from the JAVELIN Renal 101 trial from the third interim analysis with outcomes stratified by IMDC risk group.


To briefly summarize as JAVELIN Renal 101 has previously been presented and published, this trial accrued patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and randomized them in a 1:1 fashion to avelumab and axitinib or sunitinib. Patients were stratified according to IMDC risk group and, in this analysis, overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate, complete response rate, and duration of response are reported stratified by IMDC risk group.

The JAVELIN Renal 101 trial enrolled 886 patients with advanced RCC who, as of a data cut-off of April 2020, had a median follow-up of NR (42.2-NE) for those randomized to avelumab and axitinib and 37.8 (31.4-NE) months for those randomized to sunitinib. Stratified analyses demonstrated relatively consistent benefits of avelumab and axitinib, compared to sunitinib, across strata of IMDC risk groups. These effects were generally statistically significant for progression-free survival and objective response rate (apart from progression-free survival among patients with IMBC good risk disease), while the effect was statistically significant for overall survival only among those with IMDC intermediate/poor and poor risk disease.

ASCO_IMDC_risk_group.png



The effect of avelumab and axitinib were generally consistent across subgroups for both overall survival and progression-free survival.

subgroups.png



The authors conclude that, in keeping with prior reports from this trial, avelumab and axitinib demonstrates consistent progression-free survival benefits compared to suntinib across IMDC risk groups though overall survival data remain immature.

Presented by: John B. Haanen, MD, PhD, Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam

Written by: Christopher J.D. Wallis, Urologic Oncology Fellow, Vanderbilt University Medical Center Contact: @WallisCJD on Twitter at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, Virtual Annual Meeting #ASCO21, June, 4-8, 2021