ASCO 2021: Differential Responses to Taxanes and PARP Inhibitors in ATM- Versus BRCA2-Mutated mCRPC Patients

(UroToday.com) PARP inhibitors have shown promise in mCRPC patients with mutations in DNA repair, but ATM- and BRCA2-altered patients may respond differently to PARP inhibitors. Both rucaparib and olaparib were approved in May 2020 for BRCA2 and homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-mutated mCRPC, respectively. However, the sequencing and efficacy of therapies in HRR-mutated mCRPC is not well-established. At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, Dr. Christopher Su and colleagues presented results of their study assessing differences that may also exist for taxane therapy, aiding in treatment sequencing decisions.


mCRPC patients (N = 137) with deleterious ATM or BRCA2 mutations who received taxanes, PARP inhibitors, or both (for >= 21 days) were identified from 9 US academic centers. Demographic, treatment, and survival data were collected. The primary outcome was time to PSA or clinical/radiologic progression (earlier of two), which was termed PFS. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed for time-to-treatment-discontinuation, as well as overall survival (OS), from time of first taxane or PARP inhibitor therapy. Cox hazard ratio regression analyses were performed, adjusting for Gleason sum (≤7 versus 8-10). For OS, receipt of subsequent therapies following first taxane or PARP inhibitor was also included as a covariate.

There were 50 ATM- and 87 BRCA2-mutated patients identified. Among the 50 ATM-mutated patients, 40 patients (80%) received taxane only or taxane prior to PARP inhibitor, while 10 patients (20%) received PARP inhibitors only or PARP inhibitors prior to taxane. ATM-mutated patients showed a trend towards longer time-to-treatment-discontinuation when taxane was given first versus PARP inhibitors given first (p = 0.08, adjusted HR for taxane treatment 0.50, 95% CI 0.24–1.08). Considering all patients who received taxane first, ATM-mutated patients had a longer time-to-treatment-discontinuation than BRCA2-mutated patients who received taxane first (p = 0.04, adjusted HR for ATM 0.61, 95% CI 0.37–0.99). Among ATM-mutated patients, OS was longer in those receiving taxane first (p = 0.06, adjusted HR for taxane treatment 0.33, 95% CI 0.10–1.05). Among BRCA2-mutated patients, 43/87 (49%) received taxane first and 44/87 (51%) received PARP inhibitors first. BRCA2-mutated patients had longer time-to-treatment-discontinuation when PARP inhibitor was given first vs taxane given first (p < 0.0001, adjusted HR for PARP inhibitor treatment 0.32, 95% CI 0.19–0.56). Considering all patients who received PARP inhibitor first, BRCA2-mutated patients also had longer time-to-treatment-discontinuation than ATM-mutated patients who received PARP inhibitor first (p = 0.0031, adjusted HR for BRCA2 0.29, 95% CI 0.12–0.66). There was no significant OS difference in BRCA2-mutated patients regarding which treatment was given first (p = 0.63, adjusted HR for PARP inhibitor treatment 1.18, 95% CI 0.59–2.35).

ASCO_ATM-mutated_patients.png

Dr. Su concluded this presentation with the following summary points:

  • This data in ATM-and BRCA2-mutated mCRPC patients suggests a trend towards improved clinical outcomes when taxanes are used prior to PARP inhibitor in ATM-mutated patients, while the reverse sequence appears to be better for BRCA2-mutated patients
  • Future directions include analysis of OS, development of more robust multivariable models, and analysis of other co-mutations present in identified patients

Presented by: Christopher T. Su, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI

Written by: Zachary Klaassen, MD, MSc – Urologic Oncologist, Assistant Professor of Urology, Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University/Medical College of Georgia Twitter: @zklaassen_md at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, Virtual Annual Meeting #ASCO21, June, 4-8, 2021