ASTRO 2024: Short-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy and High-Dose Radiotherapy in Intermediate- and High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Results from the GETUG 14 Randomized Phase III Trial

(UroToday.com) The 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting held in Washington, DC between September 29th and October 2nd, 2024, was host to a clinical trials session. Dr. Nicolas Demogeot presented the results of GETUG 14, a randomized phase III trial of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus high-dose radiotherapy in intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer patients.


Dr. Demogeot noted that high-dose radiotherapy improves local control and biochemical failure-free survival outcomes in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients. However, to date, there has been no documented overall survival benefit. In the MARCAP consortium study, the addition of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ST-ADT) to standard-dose radiotherapy improved all clinical outcomes.1-8 Dr. Demogeot and colleagues hypothesized that adding ST-ADT to high-dose radiotherapy (80 Gy) would improve survival outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer. 

This was a multicenter, randomized phase III trial of prostate cancer patients with intermediate- or high-risk, localized prostate cancer, PSA <30 ng/ml, and without evidence of clinical seminal vesicle involvement. Eligible patients were randomized to either:

  • Arm A: High-dose radiotherapy (80 Gy)
  • Arm B: High-dose radiotherapy (80Gy) + monthly triptorelin + daily flutamide for a total duration of 4 months, starting 2 months prior to radiotherapy

The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival. Key secondary endpoints included:

  • Biochemical failure, per the Phoenix definition
  • Metastatic failure
  • Overall survival
  • Acute and late toxicities 

primary and secondary endpoints
Between September 2003 and June 2010, 376 patients were enrolled (Arm A: 191; Arm B: 185). In Arm B, 6 patients were not treated (5 withdrew consent; 1 experienced an acute coronary event). The modified intention-to-treat cohort thus included 179 patients in Arm B.
image-1.jpg
The patient characteristics are summarized below. The median patient age was 69–70 years. Overall, 12% of patients had cT3a disease (remainder ≤cT2). 40% of patients had Grade Group 3 disease. Notably ~34% had Grade Group 1 disease. 65% of patients had D’Amico intermediate-risk disease, whereas~30% had high-risk disease. 70% of patients received three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and 30% received intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
patient characteristics
The addition of ST-ADT to radiotherapy was associated with a 36% relative improvement in disease-free survival (5-year disease-free survival: 84% versus 76%; HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43–0.94, p=0.02). addition of ST-ADT to radiotherapy was associated with a 36% relative improvement in disease-free survival (5-year disease-free survival: 84% versus 76%; HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43–0.94, p=0.02
When analysis was limited to the intermediate-risk subgroup, there was a significant improvement in disease-free survival outcomes:analysis was limited to the intermediate-risk subgroup, there was a significant improvement in disease-free survival outcomes
However, there was no significant disease-free survival benefit to the addition of ST-ADT to high-dose radiotherapy in the high-risk subgroup (HR: 0.76, p=0.40).no significant disease-free survival benefit to the addition of ST-ADT to high-dose radiotherapy in the high-risk subgroup (HR: 0.76, p=0.40)
On multivariable analysis adjusted for grade and PSA level, the addition of ST-ADT to high-dose radiotherapy was found to be associated with significant disease-free survival benefits (HR: 0.66, p=0.038).multivariable analysis adjusted for grade and PSA level, the addition of ST-ADT to high-dose radiotherapy was found to be associated with significant disease-free survival benefits (HR: 0.66, p=0.038)
Patients who received ST-ADT were significantly less likely to experience biochemical failure (10% versus 21%; HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28–0.72, p=0.001).Patients who received ST-ADT were significantly less likely to experience biochemical failure (10% versus 21%; HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28–0.72, p=0.001)
There were no significant metastasis-free or overall survival benefits.

With respect to adverse events, there were no significant differences in the proportions of patients with early or late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal or genitourinary events. Patients in the ST-ADT arm had an increased frequency of early grade ≥2 erectile dysfunction (31% versus 6%; p<0.001). There were no differences in the frequency of late grade ≥2 erectile dysfunction events.there were no significant differences in the proportions of patients with early or late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal or genitourinary events. Patients in the ST-ADT arm had an increased frequency of early grade ≥2 erectile dysfunction (31% versus 6%; p<0.001)
Dr. Demogeot concluded as follows:

  • Short-term ADT improves disease-free survival in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving high-dose (80 Gy) radiotherapy
  • Short-term ADT addition to high-dose radiotherapy does not increase the frequency of early/late genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicities
  • Limitations to this study included the following:
    • Heterogenous population that included low-risk patients, in addition to intermediate- and high-risk
    • Short term follow-up
    • Low power for detecting differences between intermediate- and high-risk patients
    • Low power for assessing metastasis-free and overall survivals
    • Short-term ADT regimen was likely not long enough for high-risk patients
  • Short-term ADT should be added to high-dose radiotherapy regimens

Presented by: Nicolas Demogeot, MD, Radiation Oncology, Hopitaux de Nancy, Institut Cancerologie Lorraine, Nancy, Lorraine, France

Written by: Rashid Sayyid, MD, MSc – Robotic Urologic Oncology Fellow at The University of Southern California, @rksayyid on Twitter during the 2024 ASTRO Annual Congress held in Washington, DC between September 29th and October 2nd, 2024

References:
  1. Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Gaudin PB, et al. Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998; 41(3):491-500.
  2. Dearnaley DP, Jovic G, Syndikus I, et al. Escalated-dose versus control-dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: long-term results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(4):464-73.
  3. Bolla M, Van Tienhoven G, Warde P, et al. External irradiation with or without long-term androgen suppression for prostate cancer with high metastatic risk: 10-year results of an EORTC randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11(11):1066-73.
  4. Beckendorf V, Guerif S, Le Prise E, et al. 70 Gy versus 80 Gy in localized prostate cancer: 5-year results of GETUG 06 randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 80(4):1056-63.
  5. Hemmsbergen WD, Al-Mamgani A, Slot A, et al. Long-term results of the Dutch randomized prostate cancer trial: impact of dose-escalation on local, biochemical, clinical failure, and survival. Radiother Oncol. 2014; 110(1):104-9.
  6. Kuban DA, Levy LB, Cheung MR, et al. Long-term failure patterns and survival in a randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Who dies of disease? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 79(5):1310-7
  7. Zietman AL, Bae K, Slater JD, et al. Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results from proton radiation oncology group/American College of radiology 95-09. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(7):1106-11.
  8. Ma TM, Sun Y, Malone S, et al. Sequencing of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy of Short Duration With Radiotherapy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer (SANDSTORM): A Pooled Analysis of 12 Randomized Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2023; 41(4):881-92.