ASTRO 2024: A Validation Study on the Impact of Decipher® Testing on Treatment Recommendations in African American and Non-African American Men with Prostate Cancer (VANDAAM STUDY)

(UroToday.com) The 2024 ASTRO annual meeting included a session on novel prognostic tools in prostate cancer, featuring a presentation by Dr. Kosj Yamoah discussing the VANDAAM Study, assessing the impact of Decipher® testing on treatment recommendations in African American and non-African American men with prostate cancer.


African American men have an increased burden from prostate cancer, with the highest incidence and mortality rates. Notably, prostate cancer-specific outcomes are identical only if there is a timely diagnosis and adequate and equitable treatment delivery. In the era of precision oncology, genomic risk classifiers, such as the Decipher® score, have enhanced the personalization of care for patients with localized prostate cancer. Nonetheless, few prospective studies have prioritized the recruitment of African American men to provide level-I evidence to support the generalizability of these genomic risk classifiers in African American men who endure the disproportionate burden of prostate cancer. At the ASTRO 2024 annual meeting, Dr. Yamoah reported the first prospective validation of the Decipher® genomic risk classifier in predicting biochemical recurrence in African American men. 

Between 2018 and 2021, this multicenter prospective validation study recruited 243 patients (125 African American men, 118 non-African American) with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer and received treatment for their disease. Patients were recruited on a 1:1 (African American men: non-African American) basis and matched on the following clinical factors: age at diagnosis, Gleason score, stage, and percentage of positive cores from a baseline prostate biopsy. Patients who elected for active surveillance were ineligible for participation. Decipher® genomic risk classifier testing was ordered for all patients using their biopsy and/or radical prostatectomy tumor tissue. The primary outcome was to determine whether the genomic risk classifier can predict 2-year biochemical recurrence rates, a surrogate for disease aggressiveness, following standard treatment options. The secondary outcome evaluated the concordance between biopsy- and radical prostatectomy-derived genomic risk classifier risk scores for treatment recommendations. Decipher® genomic risk classifier scores were stratified into three risk categories: low (< 0.45), intermediate (<= 0.45 – < 0.6), and high (> 0.6).

The final analytical cohort included 207 evaluable cases (104 African American men, 103 non-African American) with both genomic and clinical outcome data. The consort diagram for this study is as follows:The final analytical cohort included 207 evaluable cases (104 African American men, 103 non-African American) with both genomic and clinical outcome data
Baseline disease characteristics were as follows, stratified by race:
Baseline disease characteristics were as followed, stratified by race
In the surgical cohort (n =74), biopsy and radical prostatectomy-derived genomic risk classifier scores exhibited a 77% concordance rate, defined as no reclassification in genomic risk classifier-based risk categories:
In the surgical cohort (n =74), biopsy and radical prostatectomy-derived genomic risk classifier scores exhibited a 77% concordance rate, defined as no reclassification in genomic risk classifier based risk categories
Among cases with discordant genomic risk classifier scores (23%), 80% of patients with low-risk biopsy genomic classifier reclassified as high-risk genomic classifier following radical prostatectomy had anterior located tumors:
Among cases with discordant genomic risk classifier scores (23%), 80% of patients with low-risk biopsy genomic classifier reclassified as high risk genomic classifier following radical prostatectomy had anterior located tumors
Patients with low genomic classifier scores had a 23-fold likelihood to reclassify as high genomic classifier after radical prostatectomy if they had anteriorly located tumors (OR 23, 95% CI 1.56-338). High-risk genomic risk classifier was associated with an 8-fold increased risk of biochemical recurrence as compared to low-risk counterparts (HR 7.93, 95% CI, 1.71-36.75). When adjusted for other clinicopathological variables, the high risk genomic classifier remained at a significantly higher biochemical recurrence risk (HR 8.97, 95% CI 1.77-45.37):Patients with low genomic classifier score had a 23-fold likelihood to reclassify as high genomic classifier after radical prostatectomy if they had anteriorly located tumors (OR 23, 95% CI 1.56-338). High-risk genomic risk classifier was associated with an 8-fold increased risk of biochemical recurrence as compared to low-risk counterparts (HR 7.93, 95% CI, 1.71-36.75)
On exploratory analysis, African American patients had improved outcomes with radiotherapy with regards to biochemical recurrence-free survival compared to those undergoing radical prostatectomy (p = 0.004), whereas there was no difference in outcomes for non-African American men:
On exploratory analysis, African American patients had improved outcomes with radiotherapy with regards to biochemical recurrence free survival compared to those undergoing radical prostatectomy (p = 0.004), whereas there was no difference in outcomes for non-African American men
Dr. Yamoah concluded his presentation discussing the VANDAAM Study with the following take-home points:

  • The Decipher® genomic classifier is a strong predictor for rapid onset of biochemical recurrence within 2-year in both African American and non-African American men
  • There was no significant interaction in predictive performance of genomic classifier across either rate or treatment (radical prostatectomy versus radiotherapy) groups.
  • Biochemical recurrence-free survival probability was significantly higher for African American men with radiotherapy compared to those who underwent surgery as their primary treatment.
  • African American men with prostatectomy as their primary treatment had a shorter time to biochemical recurrence.
  • In non-African American men, there was no significant difference seen among treatment groups regarding time to biochemical recurrence.
  • This study provides level-I evidence for integrating genomic classifiers into clinical practice guidelines to improve risk stratification and management for African American patients with early-stage prostate cancer 

Presented by: Kosj Yamoah, MD, PhD, Radiologist, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

Written by: Zachary Klaassen, MD, MSc – Urologic Oncologist, Associate Professor of Urology, Georgia Cancer Center, Wellstar MCG Health, @zklaassen_md on Twitter during the 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, Sun, Sept 29 – Wed, Oct 2, 2024.