Data for this post-hoc analysis included demographic, tumor-specific, treatment-specific, and local and metastatic disease occurrence data from 760 men who participated in the RTOG 9601 trial were extracted using the Project Data Sphere platform. Specific covariates included age, race, Karnofsky performance score, pathologic Gleason score, pT stage, surgical margin status, PSA nadir after surgery, pre-salvage radiation therapy PSA and receipt of bicalutamide vs placebo. Patients were stratified into PSA recurrence (post-RP PSA nadir < 0.5 ng/ml) or PSA persistence (post-RP PSA nadir =>0.5 ng/ml) groups, based on cutoffs reported in the original trial. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was utilized to minimize the baseline differences among the groups. Competing risk analysis tested the impact of PSA persistence versus recurrence on local and metastatic disease in the IPTW-adjusted model.
Patients that experienced PSA persistence had higher Gleason grade disease (p=0.027), more advanced pathological stage (p=0.024), and higher PSA levels at the time of receipt of salvage therapy (p < 0.001). All patients received salvage radiation therapy, and approximately 50% of the patients in each group received concomitant anti-androgen therapy (p=0.951). Over a median follow-up of 12 years, in the IPTW-adjusted cohort, the 10-year local recurrence rates were 3.2% versus 1.4% in patients with persistent versus recurrent PSA (Gray test p=0.0001). Similarly, 10-year metastatic recurrence rates were 28.6% versus 10.1% in patients with persistent versus recurrent PSA (Gray test p < 0.0001).
Dr. Sood made several concluding remarks:
- This is the first study to compare outcomes among patients with PSA persistence vs recurrence in the contemporary era
- Patients with PSA persistence after radical prostatectomy are approximately 2.5 times more likely to experience local and metastatic disease when compared to patients with PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy, despite local salvage radiation therapy with/without anti-androgen therapy
- In the future, it may be worth investigating higher salvage radiation therapy doses or earlier salvage radiation therapy, in general
Presented by: Akshay Sood, MD, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
Co-authored by: Jacob Keeley, Sohrab Arora, Deepansh Dalela, Wooju Jeong, Craig G Rogers, James Peabody, Mani Menon, Firas Abdollah, Detroit, Michigan
Written by: Zachary Klaassen, MD, MSc, Assistant Professor of Urology, Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Twitter: @zklaassen_md at the American Urological Association's 2019 Annual Meeting (AUA 2019), May 3 – 6, 2019 in Chicago, Illinois
References:
1. Shipley WU, Seiferheld W, Lukka HR, et al. Radiation with or without Antiandrogen Therapy in Recurrent Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 2017;376(5):417-428.