EAU 2018: Perioperative Major Acute Cardiovascular Events After 180-Watt Green Light Laser Photoselective Vaporization
Dr. Marchioni presented his findings from a multi-institutional, prospective database analysis on 923 patients who underwent 180-W GL PVP from 14 different medical centers. Of these patients, 16 (1.7%) were found to have suffered from MACE in 7 centers. The perioperative morbidity for minor (Clavien < 3), major complications (Clavien ≥ 3), and hemorrhagic complications were recorded. It was also determined whether or not the preoperative management of medication was continued or stopped by the time of surgery. Aspirin was never stopped under any circumstance and acted as a control.
In a head-to-head comparison between the Aspirin group and the Clopidogrel group, whether the latter was stopped or continued, revealed that the Clpidogrel group had a significantly greater percentage of major complications and hemorrhagic complications than the Asprin group. It was shown that Clopidogrel was four times and two times as likely to develop major complications and hemorrhagic complications, respectively, over the Aspirin group when performing 180-W GL PVP. Anticoagulant therapy, however, had no significant difference compared to the Aspirin group.
In closing, Dr. Marchioni reiterated how Clopidogrel did have an effect on major and hemorrhagic complications during PVP while anticoagulants had no increased morbidity. In order to further confirm these results, a prospective, randomized trial is necessary.
Presented by: M. Marchioni, MD Universit. Degli Studi "G.D'Annunzio", Dept. of Urology, Chieti, Italy
Co-Authors: Marchioni M.1, Cindolo L.2, De Nunzio C.3, Greco F.4, Destefanis P.5, Bergamaschi F.6, Ferrari G.7, Fasolis G.8, Palmieri F.9, Divan C.10, Oriti R.11, Ruggera L.12 , Tubaro A.3, Dadone C.13, De Rienzo G.14, Frattini A.15, Mirone V.4, Ricciardulli S.6 , Varvello F.8 , Voce S. 16 , Malossini G.10, Tuccio A.11 , Chiodini P.17, Ditonno P.18 , Campobasso D.15 , Schips L.19
Author Information:
1. Universit. Degli Studi "G.D'Annunzio", Dept. of Urology, Chieti, Italy
2. ASL 2 Abruzzo, Dept. of Urology, Chieti, Italy
3. "S.Andrea" Hospital, Sapienza University, Dept. of Urology, Rome, Italy
4. "Federico II" University of Napels, Dept. of Urology, Naples, Italy
5. Azienda Ospedaliera Citt. della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Dept. of Urology, Turin, Italy
6. Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Dept. of Urology, Reggio Emilia, Italy
7. "Hesperia" Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Modena, Italy
8. "S. Lazzaro" Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Alba, Italy, 9. "Santa Maria delle Croci" Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Ravenna, Italy
10. Rovereto Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Rovereto, Italy
11. Ulivella e Glicini Clinic, Dept. of Urology, Florence, Italy
12. Azienda Ospedaliera - University of Padua, Dept. of Urology, Padua, Italy
13. "Santa Croce e Carle" Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Cuneo, Italy
14. University of Bari, Dept. of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology and Andrology Unit, Bari, Italy
15."Ercole Franchini" Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Montecchio Emilia, Italy
16.“Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital”, Dept. of Urology, Ravenna, Italy
17. Second University of Naples, Medical Statistics, Naples, Italy
18. Univerisity of Bari, Dept. of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology and Andrology Unit, Bari, Italy, 19SS Annunziata Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Chieti, Italy
Written by: Zachary Valley, Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine at the 2018 European Association of Urology Meeting EAU18, 16-20 March, 2018 Copenhagen, Denmark