EAU 2020: Continence Following Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy– Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Patient Blinded Study

(UroToday.com) As part of the “Game-Changing Session 1” plenary presentation at the 2020 European Association of Urology (EAU) Virtual Annual Meeting, Dr. Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg presented his abstract entitled “Continence Following Robot-Assisted (R-LRPE) and Conventional Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRPE) – Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Patient Blinded Study”. While robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy has supplanted open and laparoscopic prostatectomy, the data to support this change is generally lacking. The LAP-01 study is the first prospective,  randomized trial to compared robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

The authors performed this randomized trial at four centers in Germany that are experienced and proficient at both approaches. The authors sought to identify whether patients undergoing robotic-assisted surgery would have an earlier return of continence. To this end, they determined their sample size with an assumption of a three-month early return of continence, utilizing an 80% power (beta = 0.2) and a significance level of 5% (alpha = 0.05). As a result, they determined a necessary sample of 782 patients. In the analysis presented here, the authors relied on data from 713 patients.

Following accrual, patients were randomized in a 3:1 fashion to robotic-assisted or conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Patients, but not surgeons, were blinded to treatment allocation. Patients were asked to record daily pad utilization. At three months, patients were unblinded. Follow-up continued for three years with assessment at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months post-operatively. Patients with no pad utilization for three consecutive days were deemed continent. The analysis was performed on a time to event basis.

Among 713 randomized patients, 527 underwent robotic surgery and 186 underwent laparoscopic prostatectomy. Perioperative outcomes were comparable between groups including nerve-sparing rates, prostate size/weight, margin status, pathological tumor stage, duration of surgery, and duration of catheterization. Patients who received robotic-assisted surgery had a significantly earlier return to continence, with much higher continence rates at three months postoperatively (log-rank test p=0.00064), at six months (p=0.004), and at 12 months (p=0.044).

cumulative incidence

Furthermore, complication rates were lower in patients undergoing robotic surgery.

The authors concluded that this represents the first multicenter, randomized data demonstrating improved continence for patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Presented by: Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, MD, PhD, Department of Urology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

Written by: Christopher J.D. Wallis, MD, PhD, Urologic Oncology Fellow, Vanderbilt University Medical Center Contact: @WallisCJD on Twitter at the Virtual 2020 EAU Annual Meeting #EAU20, July 17-19, 2020