EAU 2021: PET/CT Allows for a Reliable Assessment of the Real Nodal Burden in Clinically Node-Positive Prostate Cancer Patients Candidate for Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Multi-Institutional Series

(UroToday.com) It is now well established that PSMA PET/CT is more sensitive than conventional imaging. As such, PET/CT scan might lead to the identification of nodal metastases (e.g., cN1) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients considered for radical prostatectomy (RP). However, there is no data addressing the performance characteristics and prognostic value of a positive PET/CT in the nodes for the identification of men more likely to recur. 

The authors of this study performed an analysis of 346 PCa patients with evidence of cN1 disease on conventional imaging (n=283; 81.8%) vs. choline or PSMA PET/CT (n=63; 18.2%). All patients underwent RP and PLND. Lowess analyses explored the non-linear relationship between the number of positive spots and the number of pathologically positive nodes according to the imaging technique (cross-sectional vs. PET/CT). Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed time to biochemical recurrence (BCR) in the PET/CT cohort after stratifying patients according to the number of positive lymph nodes. They then assessed for the best cut-off for the number of LNs at PET/CT to predict BCR.

The median PSA was 15 and 10 ng/ml for CT/MRI and PET/CT, respectively (P=0.04). The rate of pN1 disease (74 vs. 69%), the number of nodes removed (25 vs. 24), and of positive nodes (2 vs. 2) at LND did not differ (all P≥0.2). The site of clinical LN was the pelvis only and the pelvis ± retroperitoneum in 84 vs. 88% and 16 vs. 12% patients (P=0.3). While cross-sectional imaging was associated with underestimation of nodal burden when ≥2 LNs were detected, PET/CT was characterized by excellent concordance with the number of positive nodes at RP.


Full demographics and additional correlations are shown below:

Gandaglia_EAU21_figure1.png

Median follow-up was 70 months and 183 patients experienced BCR. When focusing on PET/CT, the most informative cut-off predicting BCR was 2 clinically positive nodes. When patients selected based on PET/CT were stratified according to the number of positive spots (1 vs. ≥2), the 3-year BCR-free survival rates were 48 vs. 21% (P=0.03). This was consistent with what was observed when stratifying patients according to the number of positive nodes at final pathology (41 vs. 23%; P=0.04).

This correlation between the number of positive spots and BCR is seen below:

Gandaglia_EAU21_figure2.png

The curve correlating cN vs pN status is seen below:

Gandaglia_EAU21_figure3.png

Ultimately, they conclude that while conventional imaging underestimates the nodal burden, PET/CT is characterized by excellent concordance with final pathology. This resulted in a more reliable prediction of BCR, where the presence of ≥2 positive spots at PET/CT might identify men more likely to experience early recurrence.

Presented By: Giorgio Gandaglia, MD, FEBU, Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

Written By: Thenappan (Thenu) Chandrasekar, MD – Urologic Oncologist, Assistant Professor of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, @tchandra_uromd on Twitter during the 2021 European Association of Urology, EAU 2021- Virtual Meeting, July 8-12, 2021.