2. UroToday Home
  3. Conference Highlights
  4. ESMO 2020
  5. ESMO 2020 Prostate Cancer

ESMO 2020

ESMO Virtual Congress 2020: Darolutamide, Enzalutamide and Apalutamide, the Risk of Adverse Events in Patients with Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Number Needed to Harm

(UroToday.com) There has been a rapid evolution in treatment options for patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) since the spring of 2018. Up until the presentation of SPARTAN and PROSPER trials, reporting on the use of apalutamide and enzalutamide in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, at GU ASCO in February 2018, there were no specifically approved treatment options for these patients. These agents, as well as darolutamide, were subsequently approved on the basis of demonstrated improvements in metastasis-free survival. At ASCO 2020, updated results of the PROPSER, SPARTAN, and ARAMIS trials were presented demonstrating improvements in overall survival for patients with nmCRPC randomized to enzalutamide, apalutamide, or darolutamide and androgen deprivation therapy, as compared to ADT alone.


In a poster presentation at this year’s European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting, Dr. George presented an analysis examining the toxicity of these agents. Important in understanding the risk/benefit trade off of the use of these agents is that, typically, patients with nmCRPC are asymptomatic but at high risk of metastases which may be symptomatic and lead to reduced quality of life.

Dr. George and colleagues performed a search of MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify RCTs of enzalutamide, apalutamide, or darolutamide. The authors extracted adverse events that occurred at ≥5% rate in any of the trials. They subsequently calculated the number needed to harm due to adverse events (with stratification according to the grade of toxicity (1-2 vs 3 or greater). They then extrapolated these results to a European population.

As may be expected, the number needed to harm was much higher for serious adverse events (grade 3 and greater) than for grade 1 or 2 events. For some outcomes, number needed to harm was negative, indicating higher risk of this toxicity among patients in the control (rather than experimental) arm of a given trial.

ESMO20_Dan_George.png

In their extrapolation to the European population, the authors calculated the potential increase in number of adverse events among an estimated 4300 patients with high-risk nmCRPC. As seen in the figure below, the authors estimated that the increase in toxicity associated with adding a novel oral androgen axis inhibitor to ADT for patients with nmCRPC would be minimized with the use of darolutamide.

ESMO20_darolutamide.png

In conclusion, the authors suggest that use of number needed to harm can help to contextualize the risk of adverse events and guide treatment decision making.

Presented by: Daniel J. George, MD, Professor of Medicine and Surgery, Divisions of Medical Oncology and Urology in the Duke University School of Medicine and leads the Duke Prostate and Urologic Cancer Center.

Written by: Christopher J.D. Wallis, Urologic Oncology Fellow, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (@WallisCJD on Twitter) at the European Society for Medical Oncology Virtual Congress, ESMO Virtual Congress 2020 #ESMO20, 18 Sept - 21 Sept 2020