Sensitivity and Specificity of mpMRI
- PROMIS study – mpMRI and fusion biopsies detect >90% of significant prostate cancers (high sensitivity)
- Specificity, however, especially for PIRADS 3 lesions, was only 60%
- Potentially high inter-reader variability
- Ultimately, MRI is very good at picking up large, aggressive tumors
- PSA screening has high sensitivity, but very low specificity
- MV risk models can reduce unnecessary biopsies by up to 30%
- IE Rotterdam ERSPC risk calculators 3&4
Study:
- All men underwent mpMRI
- 24 core Transperineal systematic and 2-4 cores for targeted biopsies – median 27 cores
- Retrospective study of 1159 patients
- 670 biopsy naïve men
- 489 men with previous biopsy
- 732 (63%) had PCa detected
- 489 (42%) had significant prostate cancer
- On MV analysis looking at predictors of identifying significant PCa – MRI PIRADS 4-5 was by far the strongest predictor. Both in the biopsy naïve men and the prior biopsy men.
- Adding MR to the pathway increases the ability to identify significant PCa
- Generating a risk model for both groups
- MRI was more important than the PSA
- Risk model was better than the components alone in both groups
- AUC 0.83 (biopsy naïve)
- AUC 0.81 (prior biopsy)
- However, its still not perfect!
- Incorporating risk models and MRI help reduce the risk of unnecessary biopsy
Presented by: Boris Hadaschik
Written by: Thenappan Chandrasekar, MD, Clinical Fellow, University of Toronto, Twitter: @tchandra_uromd at the 37th Congress of Société Internationale d’Urologie - October 19-22, 2017- Lisbon, Portugal