The artificial urinary sphincter and 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis each require a fluid storage component and thus have components in the inguinal and pelvic regions. Because of this, patients with urologic prosthetics sometimes present challenges during future nonprosthetic operations. Presently, there is no established guideline for device management with ensuing inguinal or pelvic surgery.
This article outlines concerns during pelvic and inguinal surgery for patients with an artificial urinary sphincter and/or inflatable penile prosthesis and proposes an algorithm for preoperative surgical planning and decision making.
We conducted a narrative review of the literature on operative management of these prosthetic devices. Publications were identified by searching electronic databases. Only peer-reviewed publications available in English were considered for this review.
We review the important considerations as well as available options for operative management of these prosthetic devices during subsequent nonprosthetic surgery and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each. Finally, we suggest a framework for helping surgeons determine which management strategy is most appropriate for their individual patients.
The best management strategy will differ depending on patient values, the planned surgery, and patient-specific factors. Surgeons should understand and counsel patients on all available options and encourage informed, shared decision making to determine the best individualized approach.
Sexual medicine reviews. 2023 May 17 [Epub ahead of print]
Rafael D Tua-Caraccia, Eric S Adams, Christopher R Watters, Aaron C Lentz
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27609, United States., Section of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Duke General Surgery of Raleigh, Raleigh, NC 27609, United States.