Response to on-demand vardenafil was improved by its daily usage in hypertensive men - Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the response to on-demand vardenafil could be improved by its daily usage in hypertensive men with erectile dysfunction (ED) who previously did not answer to on-demand regime.

METHODS: Our main efficacy criterion was per patient percentage of positive answers on the Sexual Encounter Profile question 3 (SEP3). Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and nitrate-mediated dilation on brachial artery were considered as vascular parameters. A total of 74 hypertensive men with ED aged 50 to 70 years with no major cardiovascular disease were selected from 284 patients initially referred. After vardenafil on-demand usage during 4 weeks, patients with more than 50% of positive answers on the SEP3, or 50% and more than 6 points on the International Index of Erectile Function-Erection Function Domain (IIEF-EF) basal score or positive answer to global evaluation question were considered "responders." "Nonresponders" (n = 35) were randomized to daily vardenafil 10 mg or placebo during 5 weeks along with open 10 mg of vardenafil before intercourse.

RESULTS: In the active group, 38.8% of patients became responders to vardenafil (P < .05). Clinical response to continuous vardenafil correlated with sexual frequency (r = .68, P < .01), Framingham risk score (r = -.65, P < .01), carotid IMT (r = -.61, P = .01) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (r = -.64, P < .01).

CONCLUSION: Daily vardenafil during 5 weeks rescued response to on-demand regime among ED hypertensive men with no major cardiovascular disease. Further clinical trials and cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Written by:
Javaroni V, Queiroz Miguez M, Burla A, Oigman W, Neves MF.   Are you the author?
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Clinica Medica, Hospital Universitario Pedro Ernesto, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reference: Urology. 2012 Oct;80(4):858-64.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.042


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 22921698

UroToday.com Erectile Dysfunction Section