There has been a need for an acceptable common minimum data set in the scientific literature as regards the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Such a data set, if widely adopted, would improve the quality of the literature and allow objective comparisons between and across interventions.
The surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence has evolved considerably over the past few decades. The corresponding body of literature has grown exponentially describing the outcomes of hundreds of studies of these novel interventions. However, historically, the literature in this space has been of uneven quality. In order to improve the reporting of clinical studies, and ultimately patient outcomes, a standard minimum data set for trial design and publications was created by a collaborative group formed from leading scientific societies.
The consensus document created from this novel collaboration between members of SUFU (Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction), AUGS (American Urogynecologic Society), and ICS (International Continence Society) provides clear guidance for the structure of clinical studies and reporting of results in the peer-reviewed literature. This has substantial potential ramifications for scientific journals, journal editors, peer reviewers, investigators, regulatory agencies, industry, clinicians, and patients.
Current opinion in urology. 2024 Aug 06 [Epub ahead of print]
Eric S Rovner
Department of Urology, Medical University of South Carolina, South Carolina, USA.