OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the results of tension free self-created transobturator tape (SCTOT) with the standard industrially created transobturator tape (ICTOT) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study of the treatment of SUI with SCTOT (67 patients) and ICTOT (47 patients) was performed. SCTOT was created from polypropylene mesh and monofilament sutures. The symptoms were evaluated before and after the surgery with the following: the Incontinence Impact questionnaire (IIC-7), the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6), and the International Continence impact questionnaire short form (ICIQ5-SF). The overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) was used to classify patients in the SUI or the mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) group. The follow up period was 18 months. Cure was defined as a negative stress test and no need for additional surgery.
RESULTS: Objective cure was achieved in 56/67 (83.5%) participants in the SCTOT group and in 40/47 (85.1%) participants in the ICTOT group (p >0.05). There was a significant improvement in IIC-7, UDI-6, ICIQ5-SF and OABSS in both groups. Improvement was better in the group with pure SUI than in patients with MUI, but this difference was not significant. Postoperative infection occurred in 5/67 (7.4%) participants and in 5/47 (10.6%) patients in the SCTOT and the ICTOT group, respectively. De novo overactive bladder symptoms occurred in 4/67 (5.9%) of the participants in the SCTOT group and in 3/47 (6.3%) of the patients in the ICTOT group. Operating time was longer in patients with SCTOT compared to those with ICTOT.
CONCLUSION: The results of the treatment with SCTOT are not inferior to the results of the treatment with ICTOT and other results reported in the literature.
Written by:
Ignjatovic I, Potic M, Basic D, Dinic L, Medojevic N, Laketic D, Skakic A, Mihajlovic M. Are you the author?
Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center Nis and Faculty of Medicine Nis, Serbia; Municipal Hospital Prokuplje, Prokuplje, Serbia.
Reference: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Sep 8;182C:76-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.030
PubMed Abstract
PMID: 25262290