Vaginal excision of the sub-urethral sling: analysis of indications, safety and outcome

Sling techniques are the method of choice in stress urinary incontinence management, despite the high rates of complications leading sometimes to the necessity of re-operation, and the tape transection and resection are of the greatest importance.

The study was aimed at analyzing the indications, technique and effects of transvaginal tape excision.

A retrospective study including 100 patients who underwent surgical removal of the sub-urethral sling in Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe was conducted. The analyzed measures were: sling type, onset of symptoms, rates of particular complications, safety and outcome of the operative procedure.

Most complications occurred in the first 2 years after surgery. The most common indications for re-operation were: overactive bladder (OAB) (64%), persistent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (59%), pain (40%), urinary retention (40%), and erosion (29%). Some of the complications co-existed (i. e. vaginal erosion with postoperative pain, infections with urinary retention). During the procedure 1 bladder was injured and 1 patient had a hematoma. In women with OAB, 24-hour frequency decreased from 13. 3 to 8. 5 (p < 0. 001), the mean voiding volume increased from 131. 7 to 216. 4 ml (p < 0. 001), and nocturia increased from 3. 28 to 1. 19 (p < 0. 001). Intensity of urgency decreased from 8. 78 to 0. 92 in the 10-point visual score (p < 0. 001). Pain and urinary retention resolved in 39 out of 40 patients (p < 0. 0001). The rate of SUI increased from 59% to 83% (p < 0. 001).

Sling removal is safe and associated with a minimal rate of complications. Removing the tape causes resolution of most of the complications, but SUI recurs or worsens.

Archives of medical science : AMS. 2015 Oct 12 [Epub]

George Fabian, Jacek Kociszewski, Andrzej Kuszka, Margarethe Fabian, Susane Grothey, Aneta Zwierzchowska, Wojciech Majkusiak, Ewa Barcz

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe, Hagen, Gemany. , Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe, Hagen, Gemany. , Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe, Hagen, Gemany. , Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe, Hagen, Gemany. , Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe, Hagen, Gemany. , I Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. , I Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. , I Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

PubMed      Full Text Article