Defining cisplatin eligibility in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

The current treatment paradigm for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) consists of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by local definitive therapy, or local definitive therapy alone for cisplatin-ineligible patients.

Given that MIBC has a high propensity for distant relapse and is a chemotherapy-sensitive disease, under-utilization of chemotherapy is associated with suboptimal cure rates. Cisplatin eligibility criteria are defined for patients with metastatic bladder cancer by the Galsky criteria, which include creatinine clearance ≥60 ml/min. However, consensus is still lacking regarding cisplatin eligibility criteria in the neoadjuvant, curative MIBC setting, which continues to represent a substantial barrier to the standardization of patient care and clinical trial design. Jiang and colleagues accordingly suggest an algorithm for assessing cisplatin eligibility in patients with MIBC. Instead of relying on an absolute renal function threshold, their algorithm emphasizes a multidisciplinary and patient-centred approach. They also propose mitigation strategies to minimize the risk of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in selected patients with impaired renal function. This new framework is aimed at reducing the inappropriate exclusion of some patients from cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (which leads to under-treatment) and harmonizing clinical trial design, which could lead to improved overall outcomes in patients with MIBC.

Nature reviews. Urology. 2021 Jan 11 [Epub ahead of print]

Di Maria Jiang, Shilpa Gupta, Abhijat Kitchlu, Alejandro Meraz-Munoz, Scott A North, Nimira S Alimohamed, Normand Blais, Srikala S Sridhar

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada., Department of Hematologic and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA., Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada., Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada., Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada., Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal; Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada., Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. .

Go Beyond the Abstract and Read a Commentary by the Authors