This retrospective claims data study characterized real-world treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in Germany.
Continuously insured adults with incident mUC diagnosis (=index; ICD-10: C65-C68/C77-C79) in 2015-2019 were identified from two German claims databases. Patients who received first-line (1 L) treatment within 12 months of index were divided into three mutually exclusive sub-cohorts: platinum-based chemotherapy (PB-CT), non-PB-CT, and immunotherapy (IO). Patient characteristics were assessed during a 24-month baseline period; treatments, HCRU, and costs (of the health insurance fund) per patient-year (ppy) were described during 12-month follow-up.
We identified 3,226 patients with mUC (mean age, 73.8 years; male, 70.8%; mean Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, 17.6); 1,286 (39.9%) received 1 L treatment within 12 months of index. Of these, 825 (64.2%) received PB-CT, 322 (25.0%) non-PB-CT, and 139 (10.8%) IO. On average, treated patients had 5.1 hospitalizations ppy. Most UC-related hospitalizations ppy were observed in the PB-CT cohort (5.8), followed by the non-PB-CT (4.2) and IO (2.3) cohorts. Mean UC-related hospitalization costs ppy were €22,218 in the treated cohort, €24,294 in PB-CT, €19,079 in IO, and €18,530 in non-PB-CT cohorts. Cancer-related prescription costs ppy averaged €6,323 in treated patients, and €25,955 in IO, €4,318 in non-PB-CT, and €4,270 in PB-CT cohorts.
We recognized limitations in our study's sample selection due to unavailable mUC disease status data. We addressed this through an upstream feasibility study conducted in consultation with clinical experts to determine a suitable proxy. Proxies were also used to delineate treatment lines, switches, and discontinuations due to data absence. Furthermore, due to data restrictions, collective dataset analysis was not possible, prompting a meta-analysis for pooled results.
The study shows that mUC is associated with significant HCRU and costs across different types of 1 L systemic therapy.
Journal of medical economics. 2024 Apr 19 [Epub]
Günter Niegisch, Marc-Oliver Grimm, Fraence Hardtstock, Julia Krieger, Alexandra Starry, Ulrike Osowski, Barthold Deiters, Ulf Maywald, Thomas Wilke, Mairead Kearney
Department of Urology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany., Department of Urology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany., Cytel, Berlin, Germany., Merck Healthcare Germany GmbH, Weiterstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA., GWQ ServicePlus AG, Düsseldorf, Germany., Drug Department, AOK PLUS, Dresden, Germany., IPAM e.V., Wismar, Germany., Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.