DNA-PKcs expression predicts response to radiotherapy in prostate cancer - Abstract

PURPOSE:Double-strand breaks, the most lethal DNA lesions induced by ionizing radiation, are mainly repaired by the nonhomologous end-joining system.

The expression of the nonhomologous end-joining pathway has never been studied in prostate cancer, and its prognostic value for patients undergoing radiotherapy remains unknown.

METHODS:Pretreatment biopsies from 238 patients treated with exclusive external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer with ≥2 years of follow-up were reviewed to reassess the Gleason score. Of these 238 cases, 179 were suitable for in situ analysis and were included in the tissue microarrays. Expression of the nonhomologous end-joining proteins Ku70, Ku80, DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic subunits (DNA-PKcs), and X-ray repair cross complementing 4-like factor was studied by immunohistochemistry, together with the proliferation marker Ki67.

RESULTS:The predictive value of the Gleason score for biochemical relapse (using the Phoenix criteria) was markedly improved after review (P< .0001) compared with the initial score (P=.003). The clinical stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, and perineural invasion status were also associated with progression-free survival (P=.005, P< .0001, and P=.03, respectively). High proliferation (>4%) tends to be associated with biochemical recurrence; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=.06). Although the expression of Ku70, Ku80, and X-ray repair cross complementing 4-like factor was not predictive of relapse, positive DNA-PKcs nuclear staining was closely associated with biochemical recurrence (P=.0002). On multivariate analysis, only the Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen level, and DNA-PKcs status remained predictive of recurrence (P=.003, P=.002, and P=.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study highly suggest that DNA-PKcs could be a predictive marker of recurrence after radiotherapy, independently of the classic prognostic markers, including the Gleason score modified after review.

Written by:
Bouchaert P, Guerif S, Debiais C, Irani J, Fromont G. Are you the author?
Department of Pathology, CHU-Universite de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Department of Medical Oncology, CHU-Universite de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Reference: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 10. Epub ahead of print.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.014

PubMed Abstract
PMID: 22494583

UroToday.com Investigative Urology Section