Background:Prostate cancer incidence and mortality vary dramatically by geographical location.
Both are higher in developed countries. Some attribute this to westernized lifestyles of high-energy diets and limited physical activity with consequent obesity. Obesity and obesity-related diseases like diabetes cause hyperinsulinaemia, which upregulates pro-survival cell signalling. Previous work revealed diet-induced hyperinsulinaemia enhances prostate cancer xenograft growth in vivo. Metformin, an antidiabetic medication, reduces hyperinsulinaemia and also exhibits antineoplastic properties. Herein, we assess the potential additive benefit of combining bicalutamide antiandrogen therapy with metformin, in vitro and in vivo.
Methods:Using clonogenic assays, we assessed the effect of bicalutamide and/or metformin on clonogenicity in prostate cancer cell lines. Western blot and cell cycle analyses were used to elucidate mechanisms of interaction between the drugs in androgen receptor (AR)-positive (LNCaP) and AR-negative (PC3) cell lines. The combination treatment regimen was assessed in vivo using an LNCaP murine xenograft model.
Results:Micromolar bicalutamide or millimolar metformin caused a significant dose-dependent reduction in clonogenicity (P< 0.001). Combination treatment further significantly reduced clonogenicity (P< 0.005) with greater effects in AR-positive cells. Western blot and cell cycle analyses suggested differing mechanisms of interaction in AR-positive and -negative cell lines. Following combination treatment, LNCaP cells exhibited an altered cell proliferation (decreased phospho mammalian target of rapamycin expression) and perturbed cell cycle kinetics (G1/S cell cycle arrest). PC3 cells showed evidence of enhanced apoptosis (increased Bcl-2-associated X protein and decreased total caspase 3 expression). Markedly diminished tumour growth occurred following combination treatment in vivo (P< 0.001).
Conclusion: Combining bicalutamide and metformin significantly reduces prostate cancer cell growth further than either monotherapy. In AR-positive cells, this effect appeared to be mediated by reducing proliferation rates, whereas in AR-negative cells the combination treatment appeared to promote apoptosis. This combination drug regimen may improve prostate-cancer-specific survival by the direct antineoplastic properties outlined.
Written by:
Colquhoun AJ, Venier NA, Vandersluis AD, Besla R, Sugar LM, Kiss A, Fleshner NE, Pollak M, Klotz LH, Venkateswaran V. Are you the author?
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Reference: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012 May 22. Epub ahead of print.
doi: 10.1038/pcan.2012.16
PubMed Abstract
PMID: 22614062
UroToday.com Investigative Urology Section
