Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Local Staging (T Category) of Penile Cancer and the Value of Artificial Erection: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

Background: Treatment recommendations of penile cancers are determined primarily by the local extent of the primary tumor. Clinical palpation is used for local staging. Objective: We reviewed diagnostic performance of MRI in local staging of penile cancer in three clinical scenarios (Q1-Q3]) and one imaging scenario (Q4). Q1 asked whether MRI reliably distinguishes ≤ T1 from ≥ T2 disease. Q2 asked whether clinical staging reliably identifies ≤ T1 versus ≥ T2 disease and how clinical staging compares to MRI. Q3 asked if MRI is accurate for diagnosis of T3 disease. Q4 asked if artificial erection (by intracavernosal injection of prostaglandin E1) improved accuracy of MRI in T categorization. Evidence Acquisition: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched through September 13, 2021, for studies evaluating local staging of penile cancer using MRI with surgical pathology as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Meta-regression was performed to test for covariate effects of MRI and artificial erection in Q3 and Q4, respectively. Evidence Synthesis: Eight studies and 481 patients were included. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for Q1 were 86% (95% CI, 73-94%) and 89% (95% CI, 77-95%), respectively. AUC for MRI (0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.96) did not differ from clinical staging (0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94; p = .83). For Q3, MRI had sensitivity and specificity of 80% (95% CI, 70-87%) and 96% (95% CI, 85-99%). For Q4, sensitivity and specificity for MRI with versus without artificial erection were 85% (95% CI, 71-92%) and 93% (95% CI, 77-98%) versus 86% (95% CI, 68-95%) and 84% (95% CI, 70-93%) respectively (p = .50). Conclusion: MRI staging of penile cancer may be considered for ≤ T1 vs ≥ T2 disease but did not appear more accurate than clinical staging. High specificity of MRI for diagnosis of ≥ T3 disease suggests that MRI may be useful when organ-sparing approaches are planned. MRI with and without artificial erection showed similar accuracy in local staging. Clinical Impact: MRI, with or without artificial erection, may be valuable in routine preoperative evaluation of local staging of penile cancer, particularly when organ-sparing options are considered.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2022 Feb 23 [Epub ahead of print]

Satheesh Krishna, Nicola Schieda, Girish S Kulkarni, Krishna Shanbhogue, Ronaldo Hueb Baroni, Sungmin Woo

University of Toronto, Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto, ON, CAN., University of Ottawa, Department of Radiology, Ottawa, ON, CAN., University of Toronto, Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Toronto, ON, CAN., NYU Langone Medical Center, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA., Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sao Paulo, São Paulo, BR., Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, New York, USA.