To determine if there is a correlation between the newly proposed Gleason grading system by the International Society of Urological Pathology and the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score.
The records of all patients that underwent radical prostatectomy at our hospital between 2007 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The study parameters included patient demographics, the percentage of pre-operative prostate biopsies positive for PCa, biopsy Gleason Score (GS), and pre- and post-operative PSA values.
The study included 146 patients with complete medical records and follow-up data. Mean age of the patientswas 66.6 ± 6.08 years. According to the newly proposed Gleason grading system, 97 (66.4%) patients were grade 1, 20 (13.7%) were grade 2, 8 (5.5%) were grade 3, 11 (7.5%) were grade 4, and 10 (6.8%) were grade 5. The distribution of CAPRA scores was as follows: 1: n = 43 (29.5%); 2: n = 53 (36.3%); 3: n = 22 (15.1%); 4: n = 14 (9.6%); 5: n = 8 (5.5%); 6: n = 4 (2.7%); 7: n = 1 (0.7%); 8: n = 1 (0.7%). Correlation analysis showed that the CAPRA score was significantly correlated with GS based on the newly proposed Gleason grading system (CorrelationCoefficient=0.361, P < 0.001).
As a strong correlation was noted between these 2 independent grading systems, we think clinicians that seek to predict the prognosis in PCa patients should take into consideration both the newly proposed ISUP grading system and the CAPRA score.
Urology journal. 2018 Jul 30 [Epub ahead of print]
Levent Isikay, Senol Tonyali, Gulden Aydog
Clinic of Urology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Ankara. TURKEY., Clinic of Urology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Ankara. TURKEY. ., Clinic of Pathology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Ankara. TURKEY.