To evaluate the utility of the PI-QUAL score in assessing protocol changes aimed to improve image quality from a non-endorectal coil prostate MR imaging protocol during a 9-month quality improvement (QI) project and to quantify the inter-reader agreement of PI-QUAL scores between radiologists, technologists, and physicists.
This retrospective study audited 1,012 multiparametric prostate MRI examinations as part of a national QI project according to the PI-QUAL standard. PI-QUAL scores were used to inform MR protocol changes. Following the project, 4 radiologists, 2 technologists, and 1 medical physicist collectively audited an additional set of 150 examinations to identify statistical improvements in image quality using the two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test. The improvements due to individual protocol changes were assessed among subsets of the 1,012 examinations which compared examinations occurring before and after the isolated protocol change. Inter-reader variability was assessed using the percent majority agreement and the average standard deviation of PI-QUAL scores between evaluators.
During this QI project, PI-QUAL scores improved from 3.67 ± 0.75 to 4.16 ± 0.59 (p < 0.01) after implementing a series of protocol changes. Among a subset of 451 cases, we found that adopting R/L rather than A/P phase encoding reduced distortion in diffusion-weighted imaging (DW) from 21.6% (41/190 A/P phase encoded cases) to 11.5% (30/261 R/L phase encoded cases) (p < 0.01). Similarly, in the same 451 cases, adopting R/L phase encoding in T2WI reduced breathing motion artifacts from 34.6% (94/272 A/P phase encoding cases) to 12.8% (23/179 R/L phase encoding cases) (p < 0.01). DWI wraparound artifact was mitigated by employing a full-pelvis shim and enabling the abdomen shim option. The occurrence of low signal-to-noise ratio was reduced from 19.4% (19/98 cases without a weight-based threshold) to 6.3% (10/160) by instituting a weight-based threshold for using an endorectal coil (p < 0.01). The percent majority agreement was similar between radiologists, technologists and physicists, and all evaluators combined (72%, 77%, and 67%, respectively).
PI-QUAL can evaluate image quality changes resulting from protocol optimizations at both the exam- and series-levels. With training, radiologists, technologists, and physicists can perform PI-QUAL scoring with similar performance. Broadening the scope of the quality improvement team can result in meaningful and lasting change.
European journal of radiology. 2023 Jul 22 [Epub ahead of print]
Scott H Robertson, Erica Owenby, Christopher Beasley, Lisa Wall, Bradley Gray, Issack Boru, Kevin R Kalisz, Danielle E Kruse, Daniele Marin, Sarah P Thomas, Erin B Macdonald, Andrei S Purysko, Rajan T Gupta
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: ., Section of Abdominal Imaging, Imaging Institute, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States; Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: .