The Efficacy and Safety of Metastasis-directed Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.

Despite the lack of level 1 evidence, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is used widely in the management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. Data are continuously emerging from well-designed prospective studies.

To summarise and report the evidence on oncological and safety outcomes of MDT in the management of mPCa patients.

We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for prospective studies assessing progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival (ADT-FS), overall survival (OS), and/or adverse events (AEs) in mPCa patients treated with MDT. A meta-analysis was performed for 1- and 2-yr PFS, LC, ADT-FS, OS, and rate of AEs. Meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were performed to account for heterogeneity and identify moderators.

We identified 22 prospective studies (n = 1137), including two randomised controlled trials (n = 116). Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis (n = 120). The estimated 2-yr PFS was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36-56%) or 42% (95% CI: 33-52%) after excluding studies using biochemical or ADT-related endpoints. The estimated 2-yr LC, ADT-FS, and OS were 97% (95% CI: 94-98%), 55% (95% CI: 44-65%), and 97% (95% CI: 95-98%), respectively. Rates of treatment-related grade 2 and ≥3 AEs were 2.4% (95% CI: 0.2-7%) and 0.3% (95% CI: 0-1%), respectively.

MDT is a promising treatment strategy associated with favourable PFS, excellent LC, and a low toxicity profile that allows oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive patients to avoid or defer ADT-related toxicity. Integration of MDT with other therapies offers a promising research direction, in particular, in conjunction with systemic treatments and as a component of definitive care for oligometastatic PCa. However, in the absence of randomised trials, using MDT for treatment intensification remains an experimental approach, and the impact on OS is uncertain.

Direct treatment of metastases is a promising option for selected prostate cancer patients. It can delay hormone therapy and is being investigated as a way of intensifying treatment at the expense of manageable toxicity.

European urology. 2023 Nov 07 [Epub ahead of print]

Marcin Miszczyk, Pawel Rajwa, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Zuzanna Nowicka, Sung Ryul Shim, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Tatsushi Kawada, Markus von Deimling, Benjamin Pradere, Juan Gómez Rivas, Giorgio Gandaglia, Roderick C N van den Bergh, Gregor Goldner, Stephane Supiot, Thomas Zilli, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Paul L Nguyen, Alberto Briganti, Piet Ost, Guillaume Ploussard, Shahrokh F Shariat

Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland., Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland., Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan., Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland., Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea., Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan., Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany., Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France., Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain., Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Department of Urology, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Department of Radiotherapy, ICO René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France., Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncological Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI-EOC), Bellinzona, Switzerland., Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk, Belgium., Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France., Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Division of Urology, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: .

Go Beyond the Abstract and Read a Commentary by the Authors