Defining the Optimal Target-to-Background Ratio to Identify Positive Lymph Nodes in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted [99mTc]Tc-PSMA Radioguided Surgery: Updated Results and Ad Interim Analyses of a Prospective Phase II Study - Beyond the

Prostate-specific membrane antigen radio-guided surgery (PSMA-RGS) is a procedure that implies the use of specialized gamma probes to detect PSMA ligands labeled with gamma-emitting radionuclides, such as 99mTechnetium-PSMA Imaging and Surgery ([99mTc]Tc-PSMA-I&S). This technique provides surgeons with real-time feedback on the presence of cancer cells, enhancing the ability to remove metastatic lymph nodes and identify nodal micro-metastases (≤5 mm), potentially offering better spatial resolution than preoperative PSMA positron emission tomography(PET).1-6

The performance of PSMA-RGS strongly depends on the definition of suspicious nodes adopted, with a Target-to-Background (TtB) ratio ≥2 previously suggested; however, this threshold was based on studies that focused on men treated in the recurrence setting.5,7 Based on these premises, we conducted ad interim analyses on the first 30 patients who underwent PSMA-RGS at the time of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with an extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND), enrolled in a phase II, single-institution, prospective study (NCT04832958). Our analyses evaluated the performance characteristics and clinical implications of different TtB ratios adopted (≥2 vs. ≥3 vs. ≥4), comparing them with preoperative PSMA PET and histopathological findings at final pathology.

At a per-region analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for a TtB ratio ≥2 vs. ≥3 vs. ≥4 were 72%, 88%, and 87% vs. 54%, 98%, and 92% vs. 36%, 99% and 91%, respectively. Using PSMA PET to select ePLND candidates in case of positive spots would have spared 77% ePLNDs (n=23) at the cost of missing 13% (n=3) pN1 patients. A TtB ratio ≥2 at RGS identified 8 (24%) suspicious areas not detected by PSMA PET, of these 5 (63%) harbored lymph node invasion, with one more pN1 patient (11%) that would have been missed by PSMA PET. Adoption of a TtB ratio ≥2 vs. ≥3 vs. ≥4, would have allowed to spare 18 (60%) vs. 23 (77%) vs. 24 (80%) ePLNDs, missing 2 (11%) vs. 3 (13%) vs. 4 (17%) pN1 patients, respectively.

A TtB ratio ≥3 exhibited perfect correspondence with preoperative PSMA PET on a per-patient analysis. Nonetheless, both preoperative PSMA PET and the use of a TtB ratio ≥3 were characterized by a substantial risk of missing positive nodes at final pathology. A TtB ratio ≥2 was able to identify one additional pN1 patient with less than a 15% increase in ePLNDs. These findings suggest that employing PSMA-RGS and removing nodes only in men with positive intraoperative uptake would slightly increase ePLNDs while enhancing the removal of positive lymph nodes. However, PSMA-RGS was not able to overcome the dimensional limitation of PSMA PET, where no nodal metastases smaller than 3 mm have been identified.

Clinically, our results imply that using PSMA-RGS with a TtB ratio ≥2 could further reduce the residual number of patients with false negative findings at preoperative PSMA PET. In men with negative PSMA PET, the use of PSMA-RGS and sparing an ePLND in men with negative findings at both procedures could further reduce the risk of missing. When considering patients with a positive preoperative PSMA PET or those with very high-risk disease, a TtB ratio ≥2 can still have a role in identifying additional suspicious areas outside the standard ePLND template which should be excised.

Written by: Leonardo Quarta, MD, Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy

References:

  1. T. Maurer et al. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-radioguided Surgery for Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol, vol. 68, no. 3, 2015
  2. F. Barletta et al. The role of nuclear medicine tracers for prostate cancer surgery: from preoperative to intraoperative setting. Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 33, no. 6. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp. 502–509, Nov. 01, 2023.
  3. G. Gandaglia et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen Radioguided Surgery to Detect Nodal Metastases in Primary Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: Results of a Planned Interim Analysis of a Prospective Phase 2 Study. Eur Urol, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 411–418, Oct. 2022.
  4. W. Gondoputro et al. Robot-assisted prostate-specific membrane antigen-radioguided surgery in primary diagnosed prostate cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2022.
  5. T. Maurer et al. 99m Technetium-based Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen–radioguided Surgery in Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 659–666, Apr. 2019.
  6. F. W. B. van Leeuwen et al. Technologies for image-guided surgery for managing lymphatic metastases in prostate cancer. Nature Reviews Urology, vol. 16, no. 3. Nature Publishing Group, pp. 159–171, Mar. 01, 2019.
  7. H. A. de Barros et al. Robot-assisted Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen–radioguided Salvage Surgery in Recurrent Prostate Cancer Using a DROP-IN Gamma Probe: The First Prospective Feasibility Study. Eur Urol, 2022.
Read the Abstract