Through advanced spatial profiling techniques, we mapped the tumor microenvironment in treatment-naïve, high-risk prostate cancer patients, aiming to improve patient stratification and inform clinical decision-making. By cataloging these ‘cellular neighborhoods,’ we hope to contribute to the development of more precise tools for risk assessment and treatment planning in prostate cancer.
In response to the growing adoption of spatial profiling methods, we are pleased to present a checklist of best practices for spatial data analysis. This checklist includes:
- In silico tissue analysis: Enhances sample size and addresses variability by augmenting the analysis with computational modeling.
- Leave-one-patient-out analysis: Evaluates the impact of individual patient variability, which is particularly crucial in studies with small cohorts.
- Subsampling analysis: Provides robust estimates of variability in spatial associations, ensuring reliability.
- Permutation tests: Assesses the stability of findings, and we recommend utilizing several types of permutation tests to validate results.
Written by: Sebnem Ece Eksi, Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research (CEDAR), Knight Cancer Institute, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, OHSU, Portland, OR
Read the Abstract