Co-PSMA, derived from “Comparative performance of 64Copper [64Cu]-SAR-bisPSMA vs 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET CT for the detection of prostate cancer recurrence in the setting of biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy,” is a prospective, Phase II comparative imaging trial in 50 patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) post-radical prostatectomy who are being considered for curative salvage radiotherapy, led by Prof Louise Emmett at St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney. The primary objective of the study is to compare the detection rate of sites of prostate cancer recurrence, as determined by number of lesions per patient, between 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA and 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT).
The diagnostic capabilities of 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA compared to SOC diagnostic imaging have been demonstrated in two prospective clinical trials, PROPELLER and COBRA. The PROPELLER study, conducted in pre-radical prostatectomy patients, showed 2-3 times higher tumor uptake and contrast, and the detection of additional prostate cancer lesions with 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA compared to 68Ga-PSMA-111 using same day imaging only (Figures 1 and 2).
Figure 1: Detection of prostate cancer in pelvic lymph node by 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA, but not by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Readers did not detect uptake in pelvic lymph nodes on the 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (Top). PET/CT demonstrated uptake of 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA in a left pelvic lymph node according to both Readers and prostate cancer was confirmed via histopathology. Arrows highlight the node detected on 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA PET/CT. Interval between serial imaging: 7 days.
Figure 2: Higher uptake and contrast in lesions identified by 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA compared to 68Ga-PSMA-11. Concordant lesions on 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT consistently showed 2-3 times higher maximum and mean standardised uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean) and tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) with 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA compared to 68Ga-PSMA-11 (statistically significant values for all parameters). Interval between scans: 8 days.
The COBRA study, conducted in patients with BCR of prostate cancer who had a negative or equivocal SOC scan, showed that 82% more lesions were identified by 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA on next-day imaging (average across 3 readers) compared to same-day imaging.2 Delayed imaging also showed that lesions detected on next-day imaging had a higher tracer uptake and contrast vs. same-day imaging, as well as allowing for the identification of lesions under 5 millimeters (mm) in size (Figure 3). In this study, 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA identified lesions of <5 mm in size in 14% of participants.
Figure 3: Detection of a lesion in the 2 mm range and higher uptake and contrast in lesions on next-day vs. same-day imaging using 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA. Left (images): Right pelvic lymph node showing uptake of 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA on next-day imaging (arrows, bottom images). Lesion size: 1.9 mm x 2.6 mm. SUVmean 8.0, SUVmax 8.2 and TBR 67.9. Right (graphs): SUVmean/max and TBR comparing same-day and next-day imaging. Average increase across 3 readers. The SUVmax, SUVmean and TBR were assessed in up to 25 lesions per patient on each 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA scan.
Dr. Alan Taylor, Executive Chairperson of Clarity Pharmaceuticals, commented: “We are very excited to help some men who have recurrent disease based on rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels following radical prostatectomy in our own city of Sydney through supporting this Co-PSMA trial. We are pleased to see the commencement of this Co-PSMA trial with a world-renowned thought leader in the theranostics space, Prof Louise Emmett, at one of the most prominent hospitals in the country, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney. Patients have already been dosed and had same-day and next-day imaging within a few days after Co-PSMA initiation. This indicates that there is a high unmet need for improved prostate cancer diagnostics in this patient population, which is the largest population for PSMA imaging globally. The diagnostic capabilities of 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA compared to SOC diagnostic imaging have been demonstrated in two prospective clinical trials, PROPELLER and COBRA. Furthermore, the differences between 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA and SOC PSMA PET agents were observed even when state-of-the-art whole body PET cameras were used.
“Further to this trial, Clarity continues to progress our 2 registrational Phase III trials, CLARIFY and AMPLIFY, in the U.S. and Australia. Due to the high-volume centralised manufacture of product with no reliance on short half-life isotopes, we do not anticipate any issues of recruitment with any of the ongoing and planned trials with 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA.
“Knowing where the cancer is located is essential for clinicians to decide what the best treatment is for each patient. As the diagnostic performance of 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA has been demonstrated through previous clinical trials, such as COBRA and PROPELLER, we eagerly await the results of this head-to-head comparison between 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in the hope of opening the opportunity for earlier detection of disease as we progress towards our ultimate goal of better treating people with cancer.”References:
- Lengyelova et al. 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA (PROPELLER) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in patients with confirmed prostate cancer. ASCO, 2023.
- Nordquist et al. COBRA: Assessment of safety and efficacy of 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following definitive therapy. EANM, 2024.