OBJECTIVES:To investigate whether there is an association between use of angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of cancer.
DESIGN: Cohort study of risk of cancer in people treated with angiotensin receptor blockers compared with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Effects were explored with time updated covariates in Cox models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), diabetes and metformin/insulin use, hypertension, heart failure, statin use, socioeconomic status, alcohol, smoking, and calendar year. Absolute changes in risk were predicted from a Poisson model incorporating the strongest determinants of risk from the main analysis.
SETTING: UK primary care practices contributing to the General Practice Research Database.
PARTICIPANTS: 377,649 new users of angiotensin receptor blockers or ACE inhibitors with at least one year of initial treatment.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted hazard ratios for all cancer and major site specific cancers (breast, lung, colon, prostate) by exposure to angiotensin receptor blockers and by cumulative duration of use.
RESULTS: Follow-up ended a median of 4.6 years after the start of treatment; 20,203 cancers were observed. There was no evidence of any increase in overall risk of cancer among those ever exposed to angiotensin receptor blockers (adjusted hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.06, P = 0.10). For specific cancers, there was some evidence of an increased risk of breast and prostate cancer (1.11, 1.01 to 1.21, P = 0.02; and 1.10, 1.00 to 1.20, P = 0.04; respectively), which in absolute terms corresponded to an estimated 0.5 and 1.1 extra cases, respectively, per 1000 person years of follow-up among those with the highest baseline risk. Longer duration of treatment did not seem to be associated with higher risk (P>0.15 in each case). There was a decreased risk of lung cancer (0.84, 0.75 to 0.94), but no effect on colon cancer (1.02, 0.91 to 1.16).
CONCLUSIONS: Use of angiotensin receptor blockers was not associated with an increased risk of cancer overall. Observed increased risks for breast and prostate cancer were small in absolute terms, and the lack of association with duration of treatment meant that non-causal explanations could not be excluded.
Written by:
Bhaskaran K, Douglas I, Evans S, van Staa T, Smeeth L. Are you the author?
Department of Non-Communicable Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Reference: BMJ. 2012 Apr 24;344:e2697.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2697
PubMed Abstract
PMID: 22531797
UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section