The relationship of the intensity of posttreatment prostate-specific antigen surveillance and prostate cancer outcomes: Results from a population-based cohort - Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether higher intensity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) surveillance was associated with earlier detection of biochemical recurrence (BCR) or survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified a population-based cohort of 832 men diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer between January 1, 1995, and July 31, 2006. These men were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP), brachytherapy or external beam radiation therapy (RT), or primary androgen deprivation therapy or chose watchful waiting. To test the associations of intensity in PSA surveillance with study outcomes, we used a 2-year landmark analysis to assess whether the number of PSA tests during the first 2 years after treatment was associated with earlier detection of BCR, prostate cancer-related mortality, and all-cause mortality. We used landmark analysis to assess the association of PSA intensity, adjusting for clinicopathologic covariate, with outcome.

RESULTS: Median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 6.7 years. Higher Gleason score was the only clinicopathologic variable associated with higher PSA frequency in multivariable analysis for both the RP and RT groups (P value of .001 and .05, respectively). After adjustment for other covariates, the frequency of PSA tests during the first 2 years after RP did not increase the ability to detect BCR (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.19) or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.30) in the landmark analysis.

CONCLUSION: Higher intensity of PSA surveillance during the 2 years after RP or RT did not improve earlier detection of BCR or survival. Evidence-based guidelines for PSA surveillance after primary treatment are needed.

Written by:
Nabhan M, Kim SP, Shah ND, Bagniewski SM, Shi Q, Karnes RJ, Weight CJ, Davis BJ, Kohli M, Tilburt JC   Are you the author?
Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Reference: Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jun;87(6):540-7
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.01.017


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 22677074