Local staging of prostate cancer: Comparative accuracy of T2-weighted endorectal MR imaging and transrectal ultrasound - Abstract

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for staging of prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:A total of 101 men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer undergoing both T2-weighted endorectal MR imaging and B-mode TRUS for local tumor staging prior to radical prostatectomy were retrospectively identified. Three MR readers rated the likelihood of locally advanced disease using a 5-point scale. An ultrasound reader performed the same rating. Staging accuracy was compared using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS: Staging accuracy was not significantly different between MR imaging (Az = 0.69-0.70) and TRUS (Az= 0.81, P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS: T2-weighted MR imaging demonstrates comparable accuracy to B-mode TRUS for depicting locally invasive prostate cancer.

Written by:
Jung AJ, Coakley FV, Shinohara K, Carroll PR, Kurhanewicz J, Cowan JE, Westphalen AC.   Are you the author?
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628.

Reference: Clin Imaging. 2012 Sep;36(5):547-52.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.11.028


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 22920360

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section