Active surveillance of very-low-risk prostate cancer in the setting of active treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with 5α-reductase inhibitors - Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy of treating benign prostatic hyperplasia and very-low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) in patients receiving active surveillance and 5α-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI; finasteride or dutasteride) treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-two men with very-low-risk PCa (clinical stage T1c, Gleason score ≤ 6, < 3 biopsy cores positive with ≤ 50% involvement, and prostate-specific antigen density ≤ 0.15 ng/mL/g) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (≥30 cm3) received active surveillance and were treated with a 5-ARI.

RESULTS: All 82 men completed 1 year of 5-ARI therapy (n = 79) or underwent early biopsy for cause (n = 3). Restaging biopsies were performed for 76 men (22 underwent a second restaging biopsy and 1 a third restaging biopsy), 4 patients were awaiting biopsy, and 2 were lost to follow-up before the first restaging biopsy. At the first restaging biopsy, of the 76 men, 41 (54%) had no PCa, 16 (21%) continued to have very-low-risk PCa, 15 (20%) had progressed to low-risk PCa (>2 cores positive and Gleason score ≤ 6), and 4 (5%) had progressed to intermediate-risk PCa (Gleason score 7). Of the 76 biopsies, 20 were performed early for cause, with 11 (55%) showing PCa progression. Of the 82 patients, 22 (27%) underwent treatment of PCa.

CONCLUSION: Active surveillance of very-low-risk PCa in the setting of 5-ARI therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia appears to be a safe therapeutic option, because most (57 of 82; 70%) patients maintained very-low-risk PCa or had negative follow-up biopsies during a 3-year follow-up period. Complementary to the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, our results indicate that 5-ARI therapy increases prostate-specific antigen sensitivity and can aid the clinician in appropriately targeting biopsies.

Written by:
Shelton PQ, Ivanowicz AN, Wakeman CM, Rydberg MG, Norton J, Riggs SB, Teigland CM.   Are you the author?
McKay Department of Urology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.

Reference: Urology. 2013 May;81(5):979-85.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.089


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 23523297

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section