BACKGROUND: Imaging of prostate carcinoma is an important adjunct to clinical evaluation and prostate specific antigen measurement for detecting metastases and tumor recurrence.
In the past, the ability to assess intraprostatic tumor was limited.
METHODS: Pertinent literature was reviewed to describe the capabilities and limitations of the currently available imaging techniques for assessing prostate carcinoma. Evaluation of primary tumor and metastatic disease by ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and nuclear medicine techniques is discussed.
RESULTS: Ultrasonography and MRI have limited usefulness for local staging of prostate cancer because of suboptimal sensitivity and specificity for identifying tumor extent and capsular penetration. Additional MRI techniques such as magnetic resonance-based perfusion imaging, diffusion imaging, and spectroscopy may provide incremental benefit. CT and bone scanning provide an assessment of metastatic disease but are also limited by the poor sensitivity of lymph node size as a criterion for detecting metastases. Novel imaging techniques such as hybrid imaging devices in the form of single-photon emission CT/CT gamma cameras, positron emission tomography/CT cameras, and, in the near future, positron emission tomography/MRI combined with tumor specific imaging radiotracers may have a significant impact on tumor staging and treatment response.
CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional imaging and scintigraphy have an important role in assessing prostate carcinoma metastases and treatment response. Increasingly, the incremental value of primary tumor imaging through MRI is being realized.
Written by:
Outwater EK, Montilla-Soler JL. Are you the author?
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Reference: Cancer Control. 2013 Jul;20(3):161-76.
PubMed Abstract
PMID: 23811700
UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section
