Prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening: Reduction of prostate cancer mortality after correction for nonattendance and contamination in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer - Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large randomized screening trials provide an estimation of the effect of screening at a population-based level.

The effect of screening for individuals, however, is diluted by nonattendance and contamination in the trial arms.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prostate cancer (PCa) mortality reduction from screening after adjustment for nonattendance and contamination.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 34 833 men in the core age group, 55-69 yr, were randomized to a screening or control arm in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing was offered to all men in the screening arm at 4-yr intervals. A prostate biopsy was offered to men with an elevated PSA. The primary end point was PCa-specific mortality.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Nonattendance was defined as nonparticipation in the screening arm. Contamination in the control arm was defined as receiving asymptomatic PSA testing or a prostate biopsy in the absence of symptoms. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated with an intention to screen (ITS) analysis and after correction for nonattendance and contamination using a method that preserves the benefits obtained by randomization.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The ITS analysis resulted in an RR of 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.89) in favor of screening at a median follow-up of 13 yr. Correction for both nonattendance and contamination resulted in an RR of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.27-0.87) in favor of screening.

CONCLUSIONS: PCa screening as conducted in the Rotterdam section of the ERSPC can reduce the risk of dying from PCa up to 51% for an individual man choosing to be screened repeatedly compared with a man who was not screened. This benefit of screening should be balanced against the harms of overdiagnosis and subsequent overtreatment.

Written by:
Bokhorst LP, Bangma CH, van Leenders GJ, Lous JJ, Moss SM, Schröder FH, Roobol MJ.   Are you the author?
Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Reference: Eur Urol. 2013 Aug 11. pii: S0302-2838(13)00826-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.005


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 23954085

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section