BACKGROUND: The rapid adoption of image-guidance in prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) results in longer treatment times, which may result in larger intrafraction motion, thereby negating the advantage of image-guidance.
This study aims to qualify and quantify the contribution of image-guidance to the temporal dependence of intrafraction motion during prostate IMRT.
METHODS: One-hundred and forty-three patients who underwent conventional IMRT (n=67) or intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT/RapidArc, n=76) for localized prostate cancer were evaluated. Intrafraction motion assessment was based on continuous RL (lateral), SI (longitudinal), and AP (vertical) positional detection of electromagnetic transponders at 10 Hz. Daily motion amplitudes were reported as session mean, median, and root-mean-square (RMS) displacements. Temporal effect was evaluated by categorizing treatment sessions into 4 different classes: IMRTc (transponder only localization), IMRTcc (transponder + CBCT localization), IMATc (transponder only localization), or IMATcc (transponder + CBCT localization).
RESULTS: Mean/median session times were 4.15/3.99 min (IMATc), 12.74/12.19 min (IMATcc), 5.99/5.77 min (IMRTc), and 12.98/12.39 min (IMRTcc), with significant pair-wise difference (p< 0.0001) between all category combinations except for IMRTcc vs. IMATcc (p>0.05). Median intrafraction motion difference between CBCT and non-CBCT categories strongly correlated with time for RMS (t-value=17.29; p< 0.0001), SI (t-value=-4.25; p< 0.0001), and AP (t-value=2.76; p< 0.0066), with a weak correlation for RL (t-value=1.67; p=0.0971). Treatment time reduction with non-CBCT treatment categories showed reductions in the observed intrafraction motion: systematic error (Sigma)< 0.6 mm and random error (sigma)< 1.2 mm compared with <=0.8 mm and < 1.6 mm, respectively, for CBCT-involved treatment categories.
CONCLUSIONS: For treatment durations >4-6 minutes, and without any intrafraction motion mitigation protocol in place, patient repositioning is recommended, with at least the acquisition of the lateral component of an orthogonal image pair in the absence of volumetric imaging.
Written by:
Cramer AK, Haile AG, Ognjenovic S, Doshi TS, Reilly WM, Rubinstein KE, Nabavizadeh N, Nguyen T, Meng LZ, Fuss M, Tanyi JA, Hung AY. Are you the author?
Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Reference: BMC Med Phys. 2013 Sep 23;13(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/1756-6649-13-4
PubMed Abstract
PMID: 24059584
UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section
