The impact of definitive local therapy for lymph node-positive prostate cancer: A population-based study - Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the survival outcomes for patients with lymph node-positive, nonmetastatic prostate cancer undergoing definitive local therapy (radical prostatectomy [RP], external beam radiation therapy [EBRT], or both) versus no local therapy (NLT) in the US population in the modern prostate specific antigen (PSA) era.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for patients with T1-4N1M0 prostate cancer diagnosed from 1995 through 2005. To allow comparisons of equivalent datasets, patients were analyzed in separate clinical (cN+) and pathologically confirmed (pN+) lymph node-positive cohorts. Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) estimates were generated, with accompanying univariate log-rank and multivariate Cox proportional hazards comparisons.

RESULTS: A total of 796 cN+ and 2991 pN+ patients were evaluable. Among cN+ patients, 43% underwent EBRT and 57% had NLT. Outcomes for cN+ patients favored EBRT, with 10-year OS rates of 45% versus 29% (P< .001) and PCSS rates of 67% versus 53% (P< .001). Among pN+ patients, 78% underwent local therapy (RP 57%, EBRT 10%, or both 11%) and 22% had NLT. Outcomes for pN+ also favored local therapy, with 10-year OS rates of 65% versus 42% (P< .001) and PCSS rates of 78% versus 56% (P< .001). On multivariate analysis, local therapy in both the cN+ and pN+ cohorts remained independently associated with improved OS and PCSS (all P< .001). Local therapy was associated with favorable hazard ratios across subgroups, including patients aged ≥70 years and those with multiple positive lymph nodes. Among pN+ patients, no significant differences in survival were observed between RP versus EBRT and RP with or without adjuvant EBRT.

CONCLUSIONS: In this large, population-based cohort, definitive local therapy was associated with significantly improved survival in patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer.

Written by:
Rusthoven CG, Carlson JA, Waxweiler TV, Raben D, Dewitt PE, Crawford ED, Maroni PD, Kavanagh BD.   Are you the author?
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado-Denver, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Biostatistics, University of Colorado-Denver, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Urology, University of Colorado-Denver, Aurora, Colorado.

Reference: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Apr 1;88(5):1064-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.008


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 24661660

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section