AIM: To determine the treatment outcome of combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy using the non-steroidal antiandrogen bicalutamide or the steroidal antiandrogen chlormadinone in patients with prostate cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 124 patients with prostate cancer enrolled in the present study were randomized to receive CAB therapy using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, combined with bicalutamide or chlormadinone. The survival of patients was analyzed.
RESULTS: The 5-year cancer-specific survival for the bicalutamide- and chlormadinone-treated groups were 91.7% and 86.6%, respectively, with no significant difference (p=0.39). Five-year overall survival was significantly (p=0.029) better in the bicalutamide-treated group. Moreover, M1 patients in the chlormadinone group had significantly lower cancer-specific and overall survival compared to those in the bicalutamide-treated group. However, in the case of M0 patients, no significant difference in cancer-specific nor in overall survival was observed.
CONCLUSION: CAB therapy using chlormadinone led to a significantly poorer survival outcome versus the use of bicalutamide. However, because this survival trend was not observed in M0 cases, chlormadinone may still be an option for CAB therapy, depending on clinical stage and the severity of adverse effects, such as hot flashes.
Written by:
Igawa T, Tsurusaki T, Nomata K, Hayashi M, Furukawa M, Sakai H. Are you the author?
Department of Nephro-urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1, Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Reference: Anticancer Res. 2014 Apr;34(4):1983-8.
PubMed Abstract
PMID: 24692735
UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section
