Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: A meta-analysis - Abstract

Published data on the diagnosis of bone metastases of prostate cancer are conflicting and heterogeneous. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of choline-PET/CT, MRI, bone SPECT, and bone scintigraphy (BS) in detecting bone metastases in parents with prostate cancer. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were calculated both on a per-patient basis and on a per-lesion basis. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were also drawn to obtain the area under curve (AUC) and Q* value. Sixteen articles consisting of 27 studies were included in the analysis. On a per-patient basis, the pooled sensitivities by using choline PET/CT, MRI, and BS were 0.91 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.96), 0.97 (95 % CI: 0.91-0.99), 0.79 (95 % CI: 0.73-0.83), respectively. The pooled specificities for detection of bone metastases using choline PET/CT, MRI, and BS, were 0.99 (95 % CI: 0.93-1.00), 0.95 (95 % CI: 0.90-0.97), and 0.82 (95 % CI: 0.78-0.85), respectively. On a per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivities of choline PET/CT, bone SPECT, and BS were 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.81-0.87), 0.90 (95 % CI: 0.86-0.93), 0.59 (95 % CI: 0.55-0.63), respectively. The pooled specificities were 0.93 (95 % CI: 0.89-0.96) for choline PET/CT, 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.80-0.90) for bone SPECT, and 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.71-0.79) for BS. This meta-analysis indicated that MRI was better than choline PET/CT and BS on a per-patient basis. On a per-lesion analysis, choline PET/CT with the highest DOR and Q* was better than bone SPECT and BS for detecting bone metastases from prostate cancer.

Written by:
Shen G, Deng H, Hu S, Jia Z.   Are you the author?
Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.  

Reference: Skeletal Radiol. 2014 May 20. Epub ahead of print.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-1903-9


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 24841276

Go "Beyond the Abstract" - Read an article written by the authors for UroToday.com

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section