The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has undergone a substantial evolution in the past decade, with a dramatic increase in the number of available systemic therapies. Although this offers promise for improved patient outcomes, this rapid pace in development has led to new challenges in therapeutic choice. For instance, the absence of direct comparative evidence across all therapeutic options has led to a critical gap in evidence to clearly define preferred systemic therapy choice. Additionally, the rising cost of systemic therapies being evaluated for mRCC necessitates demonstration of cost-effectiveness prior to widespread adoption. This review provides an overview of the current treatment landscape in mRCC to highlight the emerging challenges faced by clinicians and health policy-makers. In addition, this review summarizes the currently available evidence that aims to address the above challenges.
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology. 2020 Jun 01 [Epub ahead of print]
Ambica Parmar, Beate Sander, Georg A Bjarnason, Kelvin K W Chan
Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluative Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada., Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluative Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Health Economic and Technology Assessment Collaboration, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada., Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada., Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluative Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: .