AI-generated R.E.N.A.L.+ score surpasses human-generated score in predicting renal oncologic outcomes.

To determine whether we can surpass the traditional R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (H-score) prediction ability of pathologic outcomes by creating artificial intelligence(AI)-generated R.E.N.A.L.+ score(AI+score) with continuous rather than ordinal components. We also assessed the AI+ score components' relative importance with respect to outcome odds.

This is a retrospective study of 300 consecutive patients with preoperative CT scans showing suspected renal cancer at a single institution from 2010-2018. H-score was tabulated by three trained medical personnel. Deep neural network approach automatically generated kidney segmentation masks of parenchyma and tumor. Geometric algorithms were used to automatically estimate score components as ordinal and continuous variables. Multivariate logistic regression of continuous R.E.N.A.L. components was used to generate AI+score. Predictive utility was compared between AI+, AI, and H-scores for variables of interest, and AI+score components' relative importance was assessed.

Median age was 60 years(IQR 51-68), and 40% were female. Median tumor size was 4.2 cm(2.6-6.12), and 92% were malignant, including 27%, 37%, and 23% with high-stage, high-grade, and necrosis, respectively. AI+score demonstrated superior predictive ability over AI and H-scores for predicting malignant(AUC 0.69 vs.0.67 vs.0.64, respectively), high-stage(AUC 0.82 vs.0.65 vs.0.71, respectively), high-grade(AUC 0.78 vs.0.65 vs.0.65, respectively), pathologic tumor necrosis(AUC 0.81 vs.0.72 vs.0.74, respectively), and partial nephrectomy approach(AUC 0.88 vs.0.74 vs.0.79, respectively). Of AI+score components, the maximal tumor diameter ("R") was the most important outcomes predictor.

AI+ score was superior to AI-score and H-score in predicting oncologic outcomes. Time-efficient AI+score can be used at the point of care, surpassing validated clinical scoring systems.

Urology. 2023 Jul 28 [Epub ahead of print]

Nour Abdallah, Andrew Wood, Tarik Benidir, Nicholas Heller, Fabian Isensee, Resha Tejpaul, Dillon Corrigan, Chalairat Suk-Ouichai, Griffin Struyk, Keenan Moore, Nitin Venkatesh, Onuralp Ergun, Alex You, Rebecca Campbell, Erick M Remer, Samuel Haywood, Venkatesh Kirshnamurthi, Robert Abouassaly, Steven Campbell, Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos, Christopher J Weight

Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Electronic address: ., Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA., Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA., German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany., Department of quantitative health sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA., Department of Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand., Cleveland Clinic Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA., Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA., Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.