OBJECTIVES:Capsular invasion is frequently detected in localized renal cell carcinoma (RCCs) samples.
Whether patients with localized RCCs and capsular invasion will suffer poorer clinical outcome than those without this pathologic finding is still at issue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic literature research of Central, Medline, Embase, and Chinese database CNKI and VIP. Cohort studies comparing the prognosis in patients with localized RCCs and with or without capsular invasion were included. Incidence of capsular invasion in different Fuhrman grade, primary TNM stage, and clinical outcome were analyzed.
RESULTS: Six cohort studies with 2,295 eligible patients were identified. Capsular invasion was presented in 500 specimens (21.79%). Lower grade (Fuhrman I/II vs. Fuhrman III/IV) and stage (pT1 vs. pT2) diseases were associated with lower incidence of capsular invasion, with OR = 0.56, 95% CI[0.37-0.85] and OR = 0.35, 95% CI[0.25-0.49], respectively. Our pooled analysis showed patients with capsular invasive had 1.80 times the risk of tumor recurrence than patients without these findings (HR = 1.8, 95% CI [1.21, 2.68]), and patients with localized RCCs and capsular invasion were detected at 4.93 times risk in developing cancer related death than those without its presence during follow up (HR = 4.93, 95% CI [2.14, 11.35]).
CONCLUSION: Patients with localized RCCs and capsular invasion are of poorer prognosis than those without this finding. Capsular invasion may serve as an additional factor in stratifying patient with localized RCCs.
Written by:
Song T, Yin Y, Liao B, Zheng S, Wei Q. Are you the author?
Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, P.R. China.
Reference: Urol Oncol. 2012 Jan 25. Epub ahead of print.
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.12.019
PubMed Abstract
PMID: 22285007
UroToday.com Renal Cancer Section