Transient variations in the serum concentrations of cell adhesion molecules following retroperitoneal laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy for localized renal-cell carcinoma - Abstract

Purpose:To evaluate differences in the serum concentrations of cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) after retroperitoneal laparoscopic and conventional open radical nephrectomies for localized renal-cell carcinoma (RCC).

Patients and Methods: A total of 62 patients with stage T1N0M0RCC were randomized to either a retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy group (n=31) or an open group (n=31). Serum levels of soluble cluster of differentiation 44 splice variant 6 (sCD44v6), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), and soluble epithelial cadherin (sE-cadherin) were determined independently by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) preoperatively, and on postoperative days 1 and 5. In addition, follow-up results were compared.

Results:On postoperative day 1, sCD44v6, sICAM-1, and sVCAM-1 levels increased significantly compared with preoperative levels in both groups (P< 0.05). sE-cadherin levels decreased compared with preoperative levels in both groups without statistically significant differences (P>0.05). sCD44v6 levels in the retro-laparoscopy group were significantly higher than in the open group (P< 0.05), while sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, and sE-cadherin levels showed no statistically significant differences between both groups (P>0.05). On postoperative day 5, all parameters in both groups were similar to preoperative values (P>0.05). Follow-up ranged from 7 to 18 months postoperatively in all 62 patients, with a 100% cancer-specific survival rate in each group.

Conclusion: Although postoperatively higher serum concentrations of CAMs in both groups and significantly elevated sCD44v6 in the retro-laparoscopy group may be facilitated, the differences in CAMs between both groups are small and transient. Together with the similar follow-up results, this further supports previous studies that failed to show a difference in the oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and provides a probable molecular mechanism.

Written by:
Yang L, Fan T, Wei Q, Cui X, Bu S, Han P.   Are you the author?
Department of Urology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

Reference: J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1323-8.
doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0673


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 22698005

UroToday.com Renal Cancer Section