Split-bolus single-phase versus single-bolus split-phase CT acquisition protocols for staging in patients with testicular cancer: A retrospective study.

Computed tomography (CT) imaging has become indispensable in the management of medical oncology patients. Risks associated with high cumulative effective dose (CED) are relevant in testicular cancer patients. Split-bolus protocols, whereby the contrast medium injection is divided into two, followed by combining the required phase images in a single scan acquisition has been shown to provide images of comparable image quality and less radiation dose compared to single-bolus split-phase CT for various indications. We retrospectively evaluated the performance of split-bolus and single-bolus protocols in patients having follow-up CT imaging for testicular cancer surveillance.

45 patients with testicular cancer undergoing surveillance CT imaging of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis who underwent split-bolus and single-bolus protocols were included. Quantitative image quality analysis was conducted by placing region of interests in pre-defined anatomical sub-structures within the abdominal cavity. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and radiation dose in the form of dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED) were recorded.

The DLP and ED for the single-bolus, split-phase acquisition was 506 ± 89 mGy cm and 7.59 ± 1.3 mSv, respectively. For the split-bolus, single-phase acquisition, 397 ± 94 mGy∗cm and 5.95 ± 1.4 mSv, respectively (p < 0.000). This represented a 21.5 % reduction in radiation dose exposure. The SNR for liver, muscle and fat for the single-bolus were 7.4, 4.7 and 8, respectively, compared to 5.5, 3.8 and 7.4 in the split-bolus protocol (p < 0.001).

In a testicular cancer patient cohort undergoing surveillance CT imaging, utilization of a split-bolus single-phase acquisition CT protocol enabled a significant reduction in radiation dose whilst maintaining subjective diagnostic acceptability.

Use of split-bolus, single-phase acquisition has the potential to reduce CED in surveillance of testicular cancer patients.

Radiography (London, England : 1995). 2024 Feb 07 [Epub ahead of print]

P W O'Regan, C Dewhurst, A T O'Mahony, C O'Regan, V O'Leary, G O'Connor, D Ryan, M M Maher, R Young

Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital/Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: ., Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: ., Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, University College, Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: .